FAQs
Most frequent questions and answers
A standard report assesses if a project is technically possible. A Bankable Feasibility Study (BFS) goes further to prove it is financially viable and low-risk for lenders. It includes a detailed, stress-tested financial model, a robust risk mitigation plan, and all the supporting data (market analysis, technical specs, legal opinions) that banks and investors require to approve funding. It’s the difference between an internal “go/no-go” document and an external fundraising tool.
Beyond global standards, a BFS for Pakistan must deeply address local context: Regulatory Compliance (NEPRA, PPIB, EPA approvals), Site-Specific Risks (land title verification, local infrastructure), Foreign Exchange & Repatriation mechanisms, and a clear analysis of the creditworthiness of the Pakistani off-taker (e.g., a distribution company). Lenders need assurance that these local hurdles are mapped and managed.
For a project like a 50-100 MW power plant or a mid-scale manufacturing unit, preparing a comprehensive BFS typically takes 8 to 14 weeks. This timeline includes primary data collection (market surveys, site visits), financial modeling with sensitivity analysis, securing preliminary technical inputs, and incorporating feedback from potential financiers. Rushing this process often leads to gaps that lenders will identify, causing delays later.
While previous studies provide a useful structural template, a credible BFS cannot be a simple “find-and-replace” document. Each project has unique site conditions, market dynamics, cost structures, and risk profiles. The financial model must be built from the ground up with current, project-specific data. A generic or repurposed study will be quickly identified by experienced lenders and undermine the project’s credibility, jeopardizing financing.